Ableism is inherent in mainstream narratives of eating disorders
The perception of eating disorders as disabilities is multifaceted, with multiple perspectives, all are valid. On one hand, the current medical model imposes a reductionistic, individualistic and binary lens. On the other hand, a social model of disability offers a de-pathologization of eating disorders.
Identifying eating disorders as disabilities has its pros and cons. On the positive side, it allows for coalition building with other movements for disability justice and fosters community healing. It also aids in addressing access needs that increase the quality of life of those affected.
However, there are also negatives, such as paternalism and infantilization, and a narrative of hopelessness or inability to change, which can lead to callousness or anxiety from healthcare providers.
Ableism manifests in various ways in the discourse on eating disorders. For instance, people with eating disorders are often infantilized, especially in high level of care (HLOC) environments. It’s common practice to treat adult clients like children, such as being escorted and watched while going to the bathroom and not having free access to phones, wallets or other necessities.
In outpatient care, infantilization shows up when providers assume they know what’s best for clients and make treatment decisions for them. Many interventions are also condescending and dismiss the inherent wisdom of people with lived experience of eating disorders (PWLLE) for their own healing.
Another manifestation of ableism is the assumption that people with eating disorders do not have capacity to make decisions. Providers and parents often declare that clients are “too compromised” to make their own choices, which frequently results in ultimatums and coercive interventions. This is a contentious issue, especially in relation to medical aid in dying (MAID). The eating disorder field lacks clarity about the decision-making rights of people with severe and enduring eating disorders (SEEDS), despite case studies proving they have decision-making capacity.
For those interested in learning more about disability justice, below are some recommended
resources:
- Decarcerating Disability, by Liat Ben Moshe
- Famished: Eating Disorders and Failed Care in America, by Rebecca Lester
- Care Work: Dreaming Disability Justice, by Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha
- Unmasking Autism : Discovering the New Faces of Neurodiversity by Devon Price
- Disability Visibility: First Person Stories from the 21st Century, by Alice Wong
- The Future Is Disabled: Prophecies, Love Notes and Mourning Songs by Leah Lakshmi
- Piepzna-Samarasinha
- @projectlets
- @neuroabolition
- @rds_for_neurodiversity
- @audhd_therapist
- @mad.subjectivity
- @mercifullymad
- @healthjusticecommons
Postpartum & Eating Disorder Recovery: My Journey and Lessons Learned
As I embarked on my journey of motherhood, I was acutely aware that my body would transform. What I didn’t anticipate was the loss of bodily autonomy, the activation of trauma memories, and the societal pressure to 'bounce back' after childbirth. If...
Recovery Coaching vs. Therapy: A Comprehensive Guide
When it comes to mental health, there are several approaches available to help individuals cope with their issues. Two of these methods are therapy and recovery coaching. But what sets them apart? In this blog post, we will discuss how recovery...
OCD Treatment: What’s The Right Approach For You?
Recovering from OCD is a tough journey. Letting go of safety behaviors (compulsions) and facing your fears (exposures) can feel like jumping off a cliff. As someone who has been through it personally as well as helps clients recover from OCD on a daily...